Obligation and Disobedience. A Review of the Concept of Political Obligation from the Theory and Practice of the Feminist Movement

Authors

Download

Abstract

The article examines political obligation from a feminist perspective, contrasting traditional theories of consent with critical feminist approaches. On the one hand, it exposes the limitations of classical social contract theories (Hobbes, Locke) and the contemporary debate surrounding the concept, and on the other, the theses of Hannah Pitkin, Carole Pateman, and Nancy Hirschmann, feminist authors who developed theories on political obligation, with the common factor of criticizing the traditional individualistic approach and emphasizing resistance as the flip side of obligation.

Using the Chilean feminist movement during the dictatorship and democratic transition as an example, the article addresses how practices of disobedience reveal the limitations of traditional theoretical frameworks. The final proposal reconceptualizes political obligation as an “obligation to create worlds”: a collective, non-sovereign responsibility that transcends obedience to laws, incorporating critical surveillance of authority and the creation of alternative spaces for feminist political action.

Keywords:

political obligation , feminism , consent , disobedience , citizenship , political participation

References

Alegría, D. (2024). Las trampas del cuidado. En D. Alegría y L. Vivaldi (Eds.), Reflexiones feministas sobre los cuidados (pp. 77-92). LOM.

Astell, M. (2014). Some Reflections upon Marriage (S. L. Jansen, Ed.). Saltar’s point press.

Bellolio, C. (2024). La era del pesimismo democrático. Debate

Butler, J. (2002). Antigone’s Claim: Kinship Between Life and Death. Columbia UP.

Castillo, A. (2016). Disensos feministas. Palinodia.

Dagger, R. y Lefkowitz, D. (2001). Political Obligation. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/political-obligation/

Darat Guerra, N. (2023). Contraciudadanía y democracia feminista. Metales Pesados.

Dietz, M. G. (1998). Citizenship with a Feminist Face: The Problem with Maternal Thinking. En J. B. Landes (Ed.), Feminism, The Public and The Private. Oxford UP.

Evans, D. T. (1993). Sexual Citizenship: The Material Construction of Sexualities. Psychology Press.

Follegati Montenegro, L. (2020). ¿Qué democracia? Feminismo y política en el Chile de los 80s. Revista de Sociología, 35(1), 56-68.

Forstenzer, N. (2022). Políticas de género y feminismo en el Chile de la postdictadura 1990-2010. LOM.

Fraser, N. (1998). Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation. The Tanner lectures on human values. University of Utah Press.

Gauthier, D. (1977). The Social Contract as Ideology. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6(2), 130-164.

Hampton, J. (2002). Feminist Contractarianism. En L. Antony y C. Witt (Eds.), A Mind of One’s Own (2ª ed.). Routledge.

Hegel, G. W. F. (2010). Fenomenologia del espíritu. Abada.

___. (2004). Principios De la filosofía del derecho, o, derecho natural y ciencia política. Sudamericana.

Hirschmann, N. J. (1992). Rethinking Obligation: A Feminist Method for Political Theory. Cornell UP.

___. (2009). Gender, Class, and Freedom in Modern Political Theory.

Hobbes, T. (1987). On the Citizen. Cambridge UP.

___. (1998). Leviathan. Oxford UP.

Honig, B. (1995). Toward an agonistic feminism. En B. Honig (Ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Hannah Arendt (pp. 135-166). Penn State Press.

___. (2013). Antigone, Interrupted. Cambridge UP.

Lister, R. (1997) Citizenship: Towards a Feminist Synthesis. Feminist Analysis, 57(1), 28-48.

Locke, J. (2016). Second Treatise of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration (M. Goldie, Ed.). Oxford UP.

Lorde, A. (2007).The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House. En Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Crossing Press.

Marín, M. (2010). What Is the Problem with Consent Theory? SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1580759

Marey, M. (2022) La dialéctica de la responsabilidad. Bordes, 7(2), 57-61

Milan Women Bookstore Collective (1990). Sexual Difference: A Theory of Social- Symbolic Practice. Indiana UP.

Mujeres por la vida. (1991). El pliego de las mujeres. En S. Palestro, Documento de Trabajo Programa Chile Serie: Estudios Sociales, 14.

O’Brien, M. (1981). The Politics of Reproduction. Routledge.

Okin, S. M. (1990). Feminism, the Individual, and Contract Theory. Ethics, 100(3), 658-669.

___. (2007). Justice, gender, and the family. Basic Books.

Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge UP.

___. (1983). Feminism and democracy. Democratic Theory and Practice (pp. 204- 217). Cambridge UP.

___. (1985). The Problem of Political Obligation: A Critical of Liberal Theory. Polity Press.

___. (1988). The Sexual Contract. Stanford UP.

Peña Aguado, M. I. (2021). Antígona, de mito androcéntrico a símbolo feminista: una reflexión. Ideas y Valores, 70(175), 42-72.

Pitkin, H. (1965). Obligation and Consent—I. The American Political Science Review, 59(4), 990-999.

___. (1966). Obligation and Consent—II. The American Political Science Review, 60(1), 39-52.

___. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.

___. (1984). Fortune is a woman: Gender and politics in the thought of Niccolò Machiavelli. University of Chicago Press.

Phillips, A. (1991). Citizenship and feminist theory. En G. Andrews (Ed.), Citizenship (pp. 76-88). Lawrence & Wishart.

___. (1992). Must feminists give up on liberal democracy? Political Studies Review, 40(1), 68-82

___. (1995). The politics of presence. Clarendon Press; Oxford UP.

Platón. (2020). Critón. En Critón. El político (pp. 9-52). Alianza.

Rawls, J. (2005). A theory of justice. Harvard UP.

Raz, J. (1990). Authority. New York UP.

Reverter Bañón, S. (2011). La dialéctica feminista de la ciudadanía. Athenea Digital, 11(3), 121-136.

Rustighi, L. (2018). Rethinking the sexual contract: The case of Thomas Hobbes. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 46(3), 274-301.

Schild, V. (2016). Feminismo y neoliberalismo en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad, 265, 32-49.

Sófocles. (1992). Antígona. En Tragedias (pp. 239-299). Gredos.

Springborg, P. (2005). Mary Astell: Theorist of Freedom from Domination. Cambridge UP.

Young, I. M. (2011). Responsibility for Justice. Oxford UP.

Zambrano, M. (1989). La tumba de Antígona. Anthropos.

Zerilli L. M. G. (2005). Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom. University of Chicago.